I offered a response to my friend Andie’s immediate reaction to LA Congress on her blog when she stated:
- Liturgical dance stupid
**UPDATE** Inspired by the comments, I’d like to amend my previous statement. Agreed, liturgical dance is not in and of itself stupid. The liturgical dance at Congress was farcical, but even then the thought in the back of my head was, “I’m sure they get a lot out of this, but I just find it distracting”. Thusly, I clarify my position and apologize for making a statement that didn’t accurately reflect my position in the first place.
In response I wrote:
I completely agree with your amended position on Liturgical Dance, as well as pretty much agree with your original position of Liturgical Dance. I think people look at their talents and think about how they can serve at Mass. You have people who are good readers, they’re Lectors. You have people who are good musicians, they’re in the choir (and yes I’m fortunate that they extend to accepting drummers). You have people who are good at being ushers, and they’re ushers. Then you have the dancers, which want to find some way to use their talents so someone created Liturgical Dance to give them something to do and they feel a sense of fulfillment by dancing, even though it’s pretty much distracting and lame at the same time.
Not all Liturgical Dancing is bad. When used sparingly, it can greatly enhance a liturgy – like when during the Mass Liturgical Dancers are setting the Alter during Preparation of the Gifts. However, most of the time it’s just overblown and basically has the dancers taking advantage of a captive audience. The worst is “interpretive dancing” during the reflective song after Eucharist. The other part when it was completely out of hand at Congress was when it was used for the readings during the Opening Ceremony. The dancer freaking picked up the Word and started dancing around with it, making me wonder “if the dancer has it, what are the readers reading?!?”. I basically lost my attention and stopped listening to the readings.
Sorry dancers. What I say may be harsh, and God bless you for trying, but I have to be honest here. Just ask the people around me that listen to me groan whenever a dancer starts up in the middle of Mass.
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Web Developer, Drummer, Catholic, Geek, Music Lover
romeyinfc [at] gmail [dot] com
AJ
March 4th, 2008 at 3:48 pm
Wow…dancing? I’m all about giving praise through whatever gifts we have. After all, I’d be in deep sludge if I weren’t allowed to use my amazing talents in the field of closing my eyes and not moving for multiple minutes at a time. But while some things have a place in the mass itself, to me, this form of dance doesn’t belong in a Catholic mass. Sure, we’re stodgy and boring as Christians go, but it also lets us be reflective.
I suppose they could take a mass and announce that this particular service would include the more artistic/modern methods of expression. That could very well include dance, music that fits more into the Michael W. Smith-esque genre, and even a homily read in beat poet style. Ok, so maybe I’m getting a bit snarky, but still, even if one had all of those things for real, I’d probably attend at least once just to see what came of it. I’d then return to my regularly scheduled quiet, humble, and boring reflection. But for those who want it, at least the option would exist without deeply bothering everyone else in the process.
Does this mean I’m becoming one of those old people we always used to say couldn’t handle the concept of change and progression in society? Gads I hope not.